Legal Opinion

Tennessee Gas Pipeline Co. v. Board of Assessors

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided October 19, 1998PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtAbrams, J.

The plaintiff, Tennessee Gas Pipeline Company (taxpayer), appealed from a decision of the Appellate Tax Board (board) denying its applications for abatement of the real estate taxes assessed by the Agawam board of assessors (assessors) on property owned by the taxpayer for the years 1992 and 1993. See G. L. c. 58A, § 13. We conclude that the board erred by disregarding relevant evidence of fair cash value without a legally supportable justification. We therefore remand this matter to the board for a redetermination of the fair cash value of the taxpayer’s property.

The undisputed facts are as…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. New Boston Garden Corp. v. Board of AssessorsMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1981
  2. Boston Edison Co. v. Board of Selectmen of ConcordMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1968
  3. Cohen v. Board of Registration in PharmacyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1966
  4. Assessors of Quincy v. Boston Consolidated Gas Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1941
  5. Boston Edison Co. v. Board of Assessors of WatertownMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1982

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Boston Gas Co. v. Board of AssessorsMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2011
  2. A. W. Chesterton Co. v. Commissioner of RevenueMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1998
  3. WB&T Mortgage Co. v. Board of AssessorsMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2008
  4. Deveau v. Commissioner of RevenueMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2001
  5. Mount Auburn Hospital v. Board of Assessors of WatertownMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2002

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API