Legal Opinion · Dissent

In Re the Wardship of B.C.

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided November 4, 1982No. 1182S412Published

1DissentHunter, Justice

I must respectfully dissent from the majority opinion. The opinion and decision of the Court of Appeals, which may be found at In re Wardship of B.C., (1982) Ind.App., 433 N.E.2d 19 (Hoffman, P.J., dissenting), should not be disturbed.

*213As the Court of Appeals acknowledged, the catalyst for the initial removal of B.C. from the care and custody of her natural mother, L.C., was L.C.’s mental illness— schizophrenia. Her mental condition was inextricably intertwined with the behavior detailed in the majority opinion, from her act of giving B.C. to strangers in a parking lot to her inability to hold…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Griswold v. ConnecticutSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
  2. Stanley v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  3. Meyer v. NebraskaSupreme Court of the United States · 1923
  4. Prince v. MassachusettsSupreme Court of the United States · 1944
  5. Skinner v. Oklahoma Ex Rel. WilliamsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1942

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API