Legal Opinion

Friedman v. Smith

District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

Decided July 17, 1956No. Civ. A. No. 9860Published

1Opinion of the Court

LORD, District Judge.

This is a tax refund suit arising under the Internal Revenue Laws of the United •States, brought by the plaintiff (hereinafter referred to as “taxpayer”) against the defendant (hereinafter referred to as “Commissioner”). At the trial, the parties stipulated the facts to be as follows:

The taxpayer timely filed her income tax return for 1945 and paid the tax shown to be due thereunder. Thereafter, the Commissioner made a deficiency assessment against the taxpayer in the sum of $2,872.93, which, together with interest, aggregated a total of $3,258.60, which was duly paid to…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Zenz v. QuinlivanCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1954
  2. Holmes v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1943
  3. Cary, Collector v. The Savings UnionSupreme Court of the United States · 1875
  4. C. F. Mueller Co. v. CommissionerUnited States Board of Tax Appeals · 1939
  5. Commissioner of Internal Revenue v. Aaron Ward & SonsCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1933

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API