Legal Opinion
Duane Reade, Inc. v. Local 338 of the Retail
New York Supreme Court
Decided December 31, 2003PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Shirley Werner Kornreich, J.
I. Factual and Procedural Background:
The instant lawsuit arises out of a labor dispute between plaintiff Duane Reade, Inc. and defendants Local 338 of the Retail, Wholesale and Department Store Union, UFCW, AFL-CIO (Local 338 or the union) and its officers (collectively the defendants).
According to the allegations in the amended verified complaint, before 2003, Duane Reade was a party to a collective bargaining agreement with an independent union, the Allied Trades Council (ATC). The agreement recognized ATC as the sole collective bargaining…
2Cases cited29 opinions
- San Diego Building Trades Council v. GarmonSupreme Court of the United States · 1959
- Boys Markets, Inc. v. Retail Clerks Union, Local 770Supreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Linn v. United Plant Guard Workers of America, Local 114Supreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Atkinson v. Sinclair Refining Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Farmer v. United Brotherhood of Carpenters & Joiners of America, Local 25Supreme Court of the United States · 1977
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Ifill v. New York State Court Officers Ass'nDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2009
- Duane Reads Inc. v. Local 338 Retail, Wholesale & Department Store UnionNew York Supreme Court · 2004
- Duane Reade, Inc. v. Local 338 Retail, Wholesale Dept. Store Union, UFCW, AFL-CIONew York Supreme Court, New York County · 2003