Legal Opinion
State v. Hipp
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided December 7, 1973No. 43042PublishedCited by 29 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Rogosheske, Justice.
Following a joint trial, defendants-appellants were found guilty by a Hennepin County Municipal Court jury of unlawful assembly in violation of Minn. St. 609.705(3), which provides:
“When three or more persons assemble, each participant is guilty of unlawful assembly, which is a misdemeanor, if the assembly is:
“(3) Without unlawful purpose, but the participants so conduct themselves in a disorderly manner as to disturb or threaten the public peace.”
On May 7, 1970, a “demonstration protesting the Red Barn organization,” presumably over the propriety of erecting a Red Barn…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Grayned v. City of RockfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Grayned v. City of RockfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Connally v. General Construction Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1926
- National Ass'n for the Advancement of Colored People v. ButtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Chaplinsky v. New HampshireSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by29 opinions
- Brook Bernini v. City of St. PaulCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2012
- Matter of Welfare of S. L. J.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1978
- State v. MauerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2007
- State v. MacHholzSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1998
- State v. WoodworthNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1975
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.