Legal Opinion

State v. Miller

Montana Supreme Court

Decided July 16, 1934No. 7,238PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Matthews

The defendant, Harry Miller, has appealed from a judgment of conviction and from an order denying him a new trial.

The information on which Miller was convicted charged the larceny of a black mare from one Henry J. Behmerwohld of Garfield county. This mare was one of a carload of horses sold and delivered by the defendant at the stockyards in Winnett, to E. W. Yickroy for shipment to Wisconsin. Before permitting the horses to be loaded, the stock inspector de manded the production of bills of sale for the horses. Miller stated, in effect, that as a horse buyer he had purchased the horses from…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Maki v. Murray HospitalMontana Supreme Court · 1932
  2. State v. Spotted HawkMontana Supreme Court · 1899
  3. State v. MatkinsMontana Supreme Court · 1912
  4. State v. BeesskoveMontana Supreme Court · 1906
  5. State v. WymanMontana Supreme Court · 1919

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Ralph v. MacMarr StoresMontana Supreme Court · 1936
  2. State v. MillerUtah Supreme Court · 1947
  3. State v. EstepMontana Supreme Court · 1936

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API