Legal Opinion

State v. Certain Contraceptive Materials

Connecticut Superior Court

Decided August 23, 1939PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMcEVOY, J.

1. On June 12, 1939, upon the written application of William B. FitzGerald, in his capacity as state’s attorney for New Haven County at Waterbury, made to the undersigned as a judge of the Superior Court, a search warrant was issued under the provisions of section 6439 of the General Statutes, Revision of 1930, authorizing a search for and the seizure of certain books, records, registers, instruments, apparatus and appliances kept. . . .and used for the purpose of violating the criminal laws of this state and particularly the provisions of section 6246 and 6562 of the General Statutes,…

2Cases cited52 opinions

  1. Dred Scott v. SandfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1857
  2. South Carolina v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1905
  3. Delaware, Lackawanna & Western Railroad v. ConverseSupreme Court of the United States · 1891
  4. United States v. ChaseSupreme Court of the United States · 1890
  5. Lambert v. YellowleySupreme Court of the United States · 1926

47 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Soto v. Bushmaster Firearms International, LLCSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2019
  2. Soto v. Bushmaster Firearms International, LLCSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2019

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API