Legal Opinion

Nawyn v. Kuchkuda

New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division

Decided December 7, 1956Published

1Opinion of the Court

43 N.J. Super. 95 (1956)

127 A.2d 897

ALBERT NAWYN AND PETER BRAUNIUS, INDIVIDUALLY AND PARTNERS T/A NAWYN AND BRAUNIUS LAUNDRY SERVICE, PLAINTIFFS-RESPONDENTS,

v.

WILLIAM KUCHKUDA AND CORRECT LAUNDRY COMPANY, A NEW JERSEY CORPORATION, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Argued November 13, 1956.

Decided December 7, 1956.

Before Judges CLAPP, JAYNE and FRANCIS.

Mr. Joseph P. Winberry argued the cause for plaintiffs-respondents.

Mr. Julius E. Kramer argued the cause for defendant-appellant Correct Laundry Company (Messrs. Chandless, Weller & Kramer, attorneys).

The…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Schank v. . SchuchmanNew York Court of Appeals · 1914
  2. Roberts v. JamesSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1912
  3. Bernstein v. RosenzweigNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1948
  4. Stein v. ScarpaSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1921
  5. Sargent v. Realty TradersSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1913

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API