Legal Opinion

Hazeltine Corp. v. Commissioner

United States Board of Tax Appeals

Decided February 20, 1935No. Docket No. 68074Published

1. The amount of an allowance for depreciation for the year 1930 determined. 2. During 1930 the petitioner spent $41,363.92 for patent applications and $36,681.26 for patent interferences. Held, that the amounts are not legal deductions from gross income.

1Opinion of the Court

HAZELTINE CORPORATION, PETITIONER, v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, RESPONDENT.

Hazeltine Corp. v. Commissioner

Docket No. 68074.

United States Board of Tax Appeals

32 B.T.A. 110; 1935 BTA LEXIS 994;

February 20, 1935, Promulgated

1. The amount of an allowance for depreciation for the year 1930 determined.

2. During 1930 the petitioner spent $41,363.92 for patent applications and $36,681.26 for patent interferences. Held, that the amounts are not legal deductions from gross income.

Paul Armitage, Esq., E. H. McDermott, Esq., and Willis H. Taylor, Jr., Esq., for the petitioner.

Bruce A. Low, Esq.,…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Hershey Mfg. Co. v. CommissionerUnited States Board of Tax Appeals · 1928
  2. Goodell-Pratt Co. v. CommissionerUnited States Board of Tax Appeals · 1925
  3. Ambassador Petroleum Co. v. CommissionerUnited States Board of Tax Appeals · 1933
  4. Seymour Mfg. Co. v. CommissionerUnited States Board of Tax Appeals · 1930
  5. Insull v. CommissionerUnited States Board of Tax Appeals · 1935

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API