Legal Opinion

United States v. Jeronimo Botello-Rosales

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided July 15, 2013No. 12-30074PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

2Per curiam

Jeronimo Botello-Rosales appeals the district court’s denial of his motion to suppress his post-arrest statements to law enforcement officers. After the district court denied the motion to suppress, Botel-lo entered a conditional guilty plea to conspiracy to manufacture marijuana in violation of 21 U.S.C. §§ 841(a)(1), 841(b)(l)(A)(vii), and 846, and possession of a firearm by a person unlawfully in the United States in violation of 18 U.S.C. §§ 922(g)(5) and 924(a)(2). We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we reverse.

The district court erred in denying Botello’s suppression…

3Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Duckworth v. EaganSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  3. California v. PrysockSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  4. Florida v. PowellSupreme Court of the United States · 2010
  5. United States v. Isaac San Juan-CruzCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2002

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

4Cited by12 opinions

  1. State of Arizona v. Joel Randu Escalante-OrozcoArizona Supreme Court · 2017
  2. People v. SuarezCalifornia Supreme Court · 2020
  3. State v. SanelleCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2017
  4. State v. JoaquinCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2020
  5. Marcos Palomar v. Raymond MaddenCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2019

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API