United States v. Jeronimo Botello-Rosales
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
2Per curiam
Jeronimo Botello-Rosales appeals the district court’s denial of his motion to suppress his post-arrest statements to law enforcement officers. After the district court denied the motion to suppress, Botel-lo entered a conditional guilty plea to conspiracy to manufacture marijuana in violation of 21 U.S.C. §§ 841(a)(1), 841(b)(l)(A)(vii), and 846, and possession of a firearm by a person unlawfully in the United States in violation of 18 U.S.C. §§ 922(g)(5) and 924(a)(2). We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we reverse.
The district court erred in denying Botello’s suppression…
3Cases cited6 opinions
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Duckworth v. EaganSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- California v. PrysockSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Florida v. PowellSupreme Court of the United States · 2010
- United States v. Isaac San Juan-CruzCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2002
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
4Cited by12 opinions
- State of Arizona v. Joel Randu Escalante-OrozcoArizona Supreme Court · 2017
- People v. SuarezCalifornia Supreme Court · 2020
- State v. SanelleCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2017
- State v. JoaquinCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2020
- Marcos Palomar v. Raymond MaddenCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2019
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.