State v. Olson
Supreme Court of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
Sheran, Justice.
Appeal from a judgment of conviction of the crime of rape.
Defendant contends that the verdict is not adequately supported by the evidence and that incidents occurring at trial created prejudice which adversely affected the deliberations of the jury.
1. We have examined the record and have concluded that the evidence is sufficient to support the verdict. But the case is sufficiently marginal in this respect to require careful examination of the proceedings with respect to the claims of error occurring at the time of the trial.
2. Appellant argues (a) that he was prejudiced…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- State v. SpreiglSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1965
- State v. NorgaardSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1965
- State v. HaneySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1945
- State v. GegenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1967
- State v. JonesSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1963
3Cited by6 opinions
- State v. WestSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1969
- State v. BudreauSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2002
- State v. FlowersSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1977
- State v. SeelyeSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1973
- State v. HayesSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1972
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.