Legal Opinion

Littlefield v. Dearden

Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Montgomery County

Decided May 6, 1943No. 2; no. 35Published

1Opinion of the Court

Corson, J.,. . . The facts in the present case have been fully set forth in the opinion of our brother, Dannehower, J., in passing upon defendants’ affidavit of defense raising questions of law: Littlefield v. Dearden et al. (No. 1), 47 D. & C. 314. The question to be decided in the present case would seem to be whether or not the transfer of the $10,000 bonds by Blabon to the trust company in 1927 was in per*321formance of her continuing obligation created by the 1925 deed of trust to guarantee to plaintiff an income of $2,000 per year during his lifetime.

Plaintiff argues that all the evidence…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Centenary M. E. Church v. ClimeSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1887
  2. Swain v. EttlingSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1859

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API