Legal Opinion

Kidwell & Heiser v. Fenley

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided February 21, 1975No. 11647PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Per curiam

This case presents the question of whether an attorney who brings suit against a client to recover unpaid attorney fees owed to him by the client may also recover reasonable attorney fees for bringing that action.

Defendant-respondent Roy Fenley was represented by the law firm of plaintiff-appellant, Kidwell & Heiser, a law partnership. Fenley was billed for the services the partnership had performed for him, but he never paid any of the amount due. Kidwell & Heiser brought suit against him, praying for judgment in the amount of the unpaid attorney fees, costs and for attorney fees for…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Mecham v. NelsonIdaho Supreme Court · 1969
  2. National Motor Service Co. v. WaltersIdaho Supreme Court · 1963
  3. Jenkins v. Commercial National BankIdaho Supreme Court · 1911
  4. Financial Credit Corp. v. DouglasIdaho Supreme Court · 1951
  5. English v. KingIdaho Supreme Court · 1924

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Farm Credit Bank of Spokane v. WisselIdaho Supreme Court · 1992
  2. Swanson & Setzke, Chtd. v. HenningIdaho Court of Appeals · 1989
  3. Idaho Power Co. v. Idaho Public Utilities CommissionIdaho Supreme Court · 1981
  4. McCoy v. State, Department of Health & WelfareIdaho Supreme Court · 1995
  5. Barnes v. HintonIdaho Court of Appeals · 1982

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API