Central Virginia Community College v. Katz
Supreme Court of the United States
1Dissent
Justice Thomas, with whom The Chief Justice, Justice Scalia, and Justice Kennedy join,
dissenting.
Under our Constitution, the States are not subject to suit by private parties for monetary relief absent their consent or a valid congressional abrogation, and it is “settled doctrine” that nothing in Article I of the Constitution establishes those preconditions. Alden v. Maine, 527 U. S. 706, 748 (1999). Yet the Court today casts aside these long-established principles to hold that the States are subject to suit by a rather unlikely class of individuals — bankruptcy trustees seeking recovery of…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Ex Parte YoungSupreme Court of the United States · 1908
- Seminole Tribe of Florida v. FloridaSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
- Hans v. LouisianaSupreme Court of the United States · 1890
- Board of Trustees of Univ. of Ala. v. GarrettSupreme Court of the United States · 2001
- Alden v. MaineSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.