Legal Opinion · Dissent

Central Virginia Community College v. Katz

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided January 23, 2006No. 04-885Published

1Dissent

Justice Thomas, with whom The Chief Justice, Justice Scalia, and Justice Kennedy join,

dissenting.

Under our Constitution, the States are not subject to suit by private parties for monetary relief absent their consent or a valid congressional abrogation, and it is “settled doctrine” that nothing in Article I of the Constitution establishes those preconditions. Alden v. Maine, 527 U. S. 706, 748 (1999). Yet the Court today casts aside these long-established principles to hold that the States are subject to suit by a rather unlikely class of individuals — bankruptcy trustees seeking recovery of…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Ex Parte YoungSupreme Court of the United States · 1908
  2. Seminole Tribe of Florida v. FloridaSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
  3. Hans v. LouisianaSupreme Court of the United States · 1890
  4. Board of Trustees of Univ. of Ala. v. GarrettSupreme Court of the United States · 2001
  5. Alden v. MaineSupreme Court of the United States · 1999

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API