Legal Opinion
Hart v. O. L. Williams Veneer Co.
Appellate Court of Illinois
Decided November 2, 1936No. Gen. No. 38,918PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtJustice O’Connor
August 21, 1935, plaintiff brought an action against O. L. Williams Veneer Co., a corporation, and others to recover $11,000 because of a claimed breach of contract. Defendants were nonresidents and were served by publication. On the same day an attachment in aid issued against Samuel Winternitz & Co., a corporation, and others. The garnishees answered that they had no funds belonging to defendants. Defendants were defaulted for want of appearance and plaintiff’s damages were assessed against them for $11,000. Afterward there was a hearing, at the conclusion of which the court discharged the…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Nichols v. ElaMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1878
- Watt-Harley-Holmes Hardware Co. v. DayCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1907
- Getchell v. ChaseMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1878
- Prewitt v. BrownMissouri Court of Appeals · 1903
- Bank of Montreal v. ClarkAppellate Court of Illinois · 1903
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Parnell-Martin Supply Co. v. High Point Motor Lodge, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1970
- Corrugated Industries, Inc. v. Chattanooga Glass Co.Mississippi Supreme Court · 1975
- Schwerdt, Grace & Niemackl v. Speedway Festivals, Inc.Court of Appeals of Kansas · 1981
- Michael Acri Boxing Promotions, Inc. v. MilesDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2000
- Gary Strugeon-Morris, Jr. v. State of Indiana (mem. dec.)Indiana Court of Appeals · 2020