Legal Opinion
Cobell v. Norton
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided March 29, 2002No. CIV.A. 96-1285(RCL)Published
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
LAMBERTH, District Judge.
This matter comes before the Court on Plaintiffs’ Motion for Order to Show Cause Why Defendants and Their Employees and Counsel Should Not Be Held in Contempt and for Sanctions for Violating the Anti-Retaliation Order, filed August 15, 2000. After a full review of the parties’ memoranda filed in support of and in opposition to the motion, the Recommendation and Report of the Special Master, and the record in this case, the Court finds that the plaintiffs’ motion should be denied.
I. BACKGROUND
The plaintiffs’ motion is based on the defendants’…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Chambers v. Nasco, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Food Lion, Incorporated v. United Food and Commercial Workers International Union, Afl-Cio-Clc, United Steelworkers of America, Afl-Cio-ClcCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1997
- National Labor Relations Board v. Blevins Popcorn Company, American Federation of Grain Millers, IntervenorCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1981
- Rodriguez v. IBP, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2001
- Evans, Joy v. Williams, Anthony A.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2000
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.