Legal Opinion

Van Klootwyk v. Arman

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided November 19, 1991No. Civ. 910112PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LEVINE, Justice.

The primary issue in this appeal is whether an injured but unsecured driver of an unsecured motor vehicle owned by a third person may recover damages for economic loss from a negligent secured driver of a secured vehicle. The trial court said yes. Appellant says no. We affirm.

Stephanie Van Klootwyk was injured in a two-car accident while driving her father’s unsecured vehicle. She sued Marlene Ar-man, the driver of the second vehicle, for negligence. The jury found Arman one hundred percent negligent and awarded Van Klootwyk $38,998.11 comprising past economic damages of…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. The Greyhound Corporation v. Excess Insurance Company of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1956
  2. Hoerr v. Northfield Foundry and MacH. Co.North Dakota Supreme Court · 1985
  3. Moser v. WilhelmNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1980
  4. Christianson v. City of BismarckNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1991
  5. State Bank of Towner, Inc. v. RauhNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1980

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Falcon v. StateNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1997
  2. Nelson v. JohnsonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2010
  3. Reisenauer v. SchaeferNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1994
  4. State v. PippinNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1993
  5. Woodworth v. ChillemiNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1999

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API