Legal Opinion
State v. Rome
Court of Appeals of Washington
Decided May 18, 1987No. 16760-0-IPublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtWilliams, J.
Russell Rome, a commercial fisherman, was convicted in district court of refusing to permit inspection of fish he had caught. Rome's conviction was reversed by the Superior Court on the ground that WAC 220-20-010(18), making it unlawful for a fisherman not to comply with directions of Department of Fisheries personnel relating to the collection of sampling data from food fish and shellfish, is unconstitutional. This court granted the State's motion for discretionary review.
On September 13, 1984, Rome was fishing alone on his boat in the Gulf of Georgia. Department of Fisheries agents in a…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Camara v. Municipal Court of City and County of San FranciscoSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Marshall v. Barlow's, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
- See v. City of SeattleSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- United States v. BiswellSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Donovan v. DeweySupreme Court of the United States · 1981
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- City of Pasco v. ShawWashington Supreme Court · 2007
- City of Pasco v. ShawWashington Supreme Court · 2007