Legal Opinion

Kasten v. G. A. Zuehlke Mortgage Loan Co.

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided January 9, 1934PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFowler, J.

The defendant appeals from an order overruling a demurrer to the complaint on the ground that it does not state facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action.

The main contention of the appellant is that the indorsement is not a guaranty of payment but a guaranty of collection. The specific provision that the defendant “guarantees the payment” of the note “at maturity or at any time thereafter, with interest at five per cent, per annum until paid,” clearly makes the guaranty one of payment. This is an absolute promise to pay the note. Estate of Menzner, 189 Wis. 340, 207 N. W. 703; O’Neil…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Menzner v. Marathon County BankWisconsin Supreme Court · 1926
  2. O'Neil v. RussellWisconsin Supreme Court · 1927
  3. Kahn v. EisenbergAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1906

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. First Wisconsin National Bank of Oshkosh v. KramerWisconsin Supreme Court · 1976
  2. Hilgendorf v. SchumanWisconsin Supreme Court · 1939
  3. Moynihan v. ElliottCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1954

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API