Legal Opinion

Halpin v. Hardy (In re Hardy)

United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Kentucky

Decided July 8, 2016No. CASE NO. 09-51121; ADV. NO. 09-5113PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Gregory R. Schaaf, Bankruptcy Judge

The Plaintiffs Dermot and Hilary Halpin brought this adversary proceeding to declare an obligation of the Debtor Defendant William Hardy non-dischargeable under 11 U.S.C. § 523(a)(2)(A). A trial was held on June 8-10, 2016, and the matter is ripe for a decision. The subject debt is dischargeable upon consideration of the parties’ stipulation of facts, arguments, testimony and exhibits admitted into evidence, and the record. The Plaintiffs have not satisfied their burden to prove false pretenses, a false representation,'or actual fraud by a…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Kumho Tire Co. v. CarmichaelSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
  2. Field v. MansSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
  3. In Re Benethel Rembert, Debtor. Benethel Rembert v. At & T Universal Card Services, Inc. Citibank South Dakota, N.A.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1998
  4. Jennifer Mannino, a Minor, by and Through Her Next Friend and Parent and Natural Guardian, Richard Mannino v. International Manufacturing CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1981
  5. Horton v. Union Light, Heat & Power Co.Kentucky Supreme Court · 1985

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Rable v. ChildersUnited States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Ohio · 2023

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API