Legal Opinion

Women's Medical Professional Corp. v. Baird

District Court, S.D. Ohio

Decided August 15, 2003No. 2:03CV162Published

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER AND OPINION

MARBLEY, District Judge.

I.Introduction

This matter came before the Court on June 12-13, 2003, for a combined preliminary injunction hearing and bench trial on the merits pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 65(a)(2). For the following reasons, the Court GRANTS Plaintiffs’ Motion for a Permanent Injunction.

II.Factual and Procedural Background

In October 2002, the Women’s Medical Center of Dayton (the “Dayton Clinic” or the “Clinic”), an abortion clinic owned by Women’s Medical Professional Corporation and Martin Haskell, M.D. (collectively, “Plaintiffs”) filed an…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Mullane v. Central Hanover Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
  2. Cleveland Board of Education v. LoudermillSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  3. County of Sacramento v. LewisSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
  4. Roe v. WadeSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  5. Yick Wo v. HopkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1886

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API