Women's Medical Professional Corp. v. Baird
District Court, S.D. Ohio
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER AND OPINION
MARBLEY, District Judge.
I.Introduction
This matter came before the Court on June 12-13, 2003, for a combined preliminary injunction hearing and bench trial on the merits pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 65(a)(2). For the following reasons, the Court GRANTS Plaintiffs’ Motion for a Permanent Injunction.
II.Factual and Procedural Background
In October 2002, the Women’s Medical Center of Dayton (the “Dayton Clinic” or the “Clinic”), an abortion clinic owned by Women’s Medical Professional Corporation and Martin Haskell, M.D. (collectively, “Plaintiffs”) filed an…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Mullane v. Central Hanover Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
- Cleveland Board of Education v. LoudermillSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- County of Sacramento v. LewisSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
- Roe v. WadeSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Yick Wo v. HopkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.