Legal Opinion

State v. Barela

New Mexico Court of Appeals

Decided December 6, 1979No. 4169PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

WOOD, Chief Judge.

The State sought the forfeiture of a pickup truck under § 30-31-34, N.M.S.A. 1978. Although quasi-criminal, and gauged by standards applicable to a criminal proceeding, this was a civil proceeding. State v. Ozarek, 91 N.M. 275, 573 P.2d 209 (1978); In re One 1967 Peterbilt Tractor, Etc., 84 N.M. 652, 506 P.2d 1199 (1973). On the basis of the affidavit submitted by the State in support of the petition for forfeiture, the trial court granted summary judgment in favor of Barela, the person to whom the pickup was registered. The State appeals. The issue is the meaning of…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. United States v. One 1974 Cadillac Eldorado Sedan, Serial No. 6l47s4q407966Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1977
  2. State v. OzarekNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1978
  3. In Re One 1967 Peterbilt Tractor, Etc.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1973

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. State v. SheetsNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1980
  2. State Ex Rel. Department of Public Safety, State Police Division v. One 1990 Chevrolet Pickup, Model Z-71, Four Wheel Drive, White, Bearing Texas License No. 3003VR, Vin: 1GCDK14K6LZ204458New Mexico Court of Appeals · 1993
  3. State v. StevensNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1983
  4. Mitchell v. City of Farmington Police DepartmentNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1991
  5. State v. BarelaNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1979

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API