People v. Wilson
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
—Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: Supreme Court properly denied the motion of defendant to suppress the statements he made to the police. The testimony at the suppression hearing supports the court’s finding that the statements were voluntarily given. That testimony established that there was no causal connection between any injuries defendant received at the time of the arrest and the statement taken hours later (see, People v Gomez, 249 AD2d 237, lv denied 92 NY2d 852; see also, People v Nieves, 205 AD2d 173, 184, affd 88 NY2d 618), and that defendant was not “ ‘intoxicated to the…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- People v. SchompertNew York Court of Appeals · 1967
- People v. HicksNew York Court of Appeals · 1987
- People v. StokesNew York Court of Appeals · 1996
- People v. NievesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1994
- People v. DavisAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1993
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- People v. WilliamsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2001