Legal Opinion

HYATT v. United States

United States Court of Federal Claims

Decided January 14, 2025No. 23-499Published

1Opinion of the Court

In the United States Court of Federal Claims No. 23-499 Filed: January 14, 2025 RICKEY A. HYATT and BARBARA HYATT, Plaintiffs, v. THE UNITED STATES, Defendant. Lindsay S.C. Brinton, Meghan S. Largent, and Michael Armstrong, Lewis Rice LLC, St. Louis, Missouri, with J. Nathan Duggins, III, Michael S. Fox, and Jason B. Sparrow, Tuggle Duggins, P.A., Greensboro, North Carolina, for Plaintiffs. Peter W. Brocker, Natural Resources Section, with Todd Kim, Assistant Attorney General, Environment & Natural Resources Division, U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, D.C., for Defendant. MEMORANDUM…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. Hensley v. EckerhartSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. Blum v. StensonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  3. Pennsylvania v. Delaware Valley Citizens' Council for Clean AirSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. City of Burlington v. DagueSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  5. Davis v. Michigan Department of the TreasurySupreme Court of the United States · 1989

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API