Cozby v. State
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
The opinion states the case.
1Opinion of the Court
PRENDERGAST, Presiding Judge.
Appellant was convicted of perjury and assessed the lowest punishment.
Appellant’s able attorneys earnestly insist that the evidence was insufficient to sustain the verdict, and that his charges should have been given peremptorily requiring the jury to acquit him because the State did not prove by two credible witnesses, or one credible witness corroborated strongly by other evidence, the falsity of the defendant’s statement made the basis of perjury. We have carefully read and studied the testimony. The jury after hearing all of it and the argument from both sides…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Franklin v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1897
- Holliday v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1895
- Tracy v. StateTexas Supreme Court · 1875
- Smith v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1892
- Height v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1912
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.