State v. Fowler
Supreme Court of Rhode Island
1DissentBaker, J.
I am unable to agree with the majority opinion because in my judgment section 11 of chapter 149 of the ordinances of the city of Pawtucket enacted August 17, 1916 is clearly prohibitory and not in any sense merely regulatory in respect to the right of free speech in a public park in that city. The section does not even contain, for what it may be worth, a provision that a license may be issued by a municipal authority permitting the making of an address in any maimer, at any time, or in any place. It may be that other sections of the chapter are regulatory in nature, but they in no way refer…
Also in this document: Concurring in part, dissenting in part.
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Haguer v. Committee for Industrial OrganizationSupreme Court of the United States · 1939
- Niemotko v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1951
- Saia v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
- Jamison v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
- Davis v. MassachusettsSupreme Court of the United States · 1897
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.