Legal Opinion

Mount v. State

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided June 16, 1856PublishedCited by 9 opinions

APPEAL from the Fayette Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtDavison, J.

This was a prosecution for gaming, founded on section 28, 2 R. S., 435, which provides that “ every person who shall, by playing or betting at or upon any game or wager whatever, either lose or win any article of value, shall be fined,” &c. The information charges that one Groff,> on, &c., at, &c., owned and kept a ten pin alley for hire, and .that Mount, the defendant, and one Miller then and there hired of Groff the use of the alley, to play one game of ten pins, for which they agreed to pay him 10 cents; and that in pursuance of said hiring, Mount and Miller then and there played said game…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. People v. SergeantNew York Supreme Court · 1828

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Hamilton v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1881
  2. Carr v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1875
  3. Williams v. City of WarsawIndiana Supreme Court · 1878
  4. Dyer v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1882
  5. Hopkins v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1905

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API