Legal Opinion

Fienberg v. Adelman

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided May 24, 1927PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCarroll, J.

The petitioner and the respondent’s intestate were lessee and lessor respectively of a store at No. 1045 Washington Street, Boston, for a term of five years from *144July 1, 1921. On March 15, 1923, the lessor promised in writing “to give to Mr. D. Fienberg an option on store at 1045 Washington Street, when the present lease expires at the same rental ($2400) a year for five years after the old lease expires.” The petition by the lessee is to enforce specific performance of the option. According to the plaintiff’s testimony, in March, 1923, the lessor desired to put in steam and water pipes…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Parrot v. Mexican Central Railway Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1911
  2. Torrey v. AdamsMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1925
  3. Abbott v. DoaneMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1895

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Bailey v. First Realty Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1940
  2. Berman v. GellerMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1950
  3. Tashjian v. KarpMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1931
  4. Michael Chevrolet, Inc. v. Institution for SavingsMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1947
  5. Briskin v. Packard Motor Car Co. of New YorkMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1929

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API