Hilliard v. Sterlingworth Railway Supply Co.
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Appeal, No. 76, Jan. T., 1908, by defendant, from decree of C. P. Northampton Co., April T., 1907, No. 1, discharging rule to remove a receiver in case of Clinton Hilliard et al. v. Sterlingworth Railway Supply Company, defendant, and F. W. Coolbaugh, intervenor. Rule to show cause why a receiver should not be removed. Before Stewart, J. The opinion of the Supreme Court states the case. Error assigned was in discharging rule to remove receiver.
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Mr. Justice Potter,
Appellant in this case has failed to print the docket entries in the court below, but we find from the paper-book of the appellee that on February 12, 1907, a bill in equity was filed by Clinton Hilliard et al. against the Sterlingworth Railway Supply Company, a corporation. On the same day the court appointed William J. Kuebler receiver of the defendant corporation, and the bond of the receiver was approved and filed. On February 18, 1907, F. W. Coolbaugh, the present appellant, asked leave to intervene, and on March 18, 1907, he filed a petition, in which he was…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Milwaukie & Minnesota Railroad v. SoutterSupreme Court of the United States · 1865
- In re MisselwitzSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1896