Legal Opinion

Smith v. . Miller

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided January 8, 1910Published

1Opinion of the Court

HOKE, J., concurring in result; MANNING, J., did not sit. The facts are stated in the opinion of the Court. This action was brought, under sec. 1590 of the Revisal of 1905, for the purpose of selling certain land or lots, situated in the town of Asheville, and reinvesting the proceeds of sale in the improvement of other property belonging to the parties interested. The court below found the following facts, substantially:

1. In 1856, James M. Smith died, seized and possessed of two tracts of land, situated in the town of Asheville and fully described in the pleadings. He left a last will and…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Anderson v. WilkinsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1906
  2. Hodges v. Lipscomb.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1903
  3. McAfee v. Green.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1906
  4. Bullock v. Planters Cotton-Seed Oil Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1914
  5. Smith v. . MillerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1910

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API