Legal Opinion

Vedder v. Hildreth

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided December 15, 1853PublishedCited by 5 opinions

ERROR TO THE COUNTY COURT OF DODGE COUNTY. The statement of this case sufficiently appears in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the Court

By the Count,

Whiton, C. J.

This was an action of trespass, for taking two horses, one wagon, and one double harness. The declaration states, as special damage occasioned by the taking of the property, that at the time when the property was taken, the plaintiff was moving, with his family and household goods, from the town of Rubicon to the State of Illinois, and was employing his horses, wagon and harness for that purpose ; that by the taking and detention of the property, he was prevented from pursuing bis journey, and put to great expense for the support of himself and family; that when the…

2Cited by5 opinions

  1. Ingram v. RankinWisconsin Supreme Court · 1879
  2. Bradley v. DentonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1854
  3. Dwyer Bros. v. Administrators of the Tulane Educational FundSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1895
  4. Buffalo B. S. C. Co. v. Milby & DowTexas Supreme Court · 1885
  5. Kellogg v. Chicago & Northwestern Railway Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1870

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API