State v. Flack
West Virginia Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
Justice KETCHUM:
The defendant, Brandon Flack, appeals his convictions for the offenses of first degree mui’der, first degi’ee robbery and criminal eonspix’aey. Upon thorough review of the record and consideration of the pai’ties’ bx’iefs and arguments, we find no revei’sible ex’ror and affii’m the defendant’s convictions.
I. Factual Background
In late January 2011, the defendant and thx-ee other men devised a plan to bux-glarize the home of the defendant’s uncle. On the evening of the planned burglax-y the four men gathered ski masks and two handguns, and then drove from their homes in Pulaski,…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Crawford v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- State v. MillerWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1995
- State v. VanceWest Virginia Supreme Court · 2000
- Sanders v. Georgia-Pacific Corp.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1976
- State v. RodoussakisWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1998
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by25 opinions
- State of Tennessee v. Jessie DotsonTennessee Supreme Court · 2014
- Flack v. BallardWest Virginia Supreme Court · 2017
- Jasman Montgomery v. David Ballard, WardenWest Virginia Supreme Court · 2019
- Mark T. Coleman v. J.T. BinionWest Virginia Supreme Court · 2019
- State of West Virginia v. Jesse Lee HeaterWest Virginia Supreme Court · 2016
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.