Legal Opinion

Reed v. Reed

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided October 1, 2003No. 4D01-4104PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Per curiam

In this dissolution action, we reverse the final judgment awarding former wife $4,000 in attorney’s fees for the period after January 11, 2001, because the judgment lacks the requisite findings under Florida Patient’s Compensation Fund v. Rowe, 472 So.2d 1145 (Fla.1985)(requiring the trial court to make express findings regarding the number of hours reasonably expended and a reasonable hourly rate for the type of litigation involved). On remand, a new evidentiary hearing will be required since the trial judge that entered the attorney’s fee judgment has recused himself, precluding the usual…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Florida Patient's Compensation Fund v. RoweSupreme Court of Florida · 1985
  2. Guardian. of Halpert v. Rosenbloom, PaDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1997
  3. Matisko v. MatiskoDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2003

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Reed v. ReedDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2005
  2. Stanton v. StantonDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2010
  3. Atlanta Capital Partners v. QuamtelDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2013

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API