Legal Opinion

Schofield v. Maverik Country Store

District Court, D. Utah

Decided June 18, 2014No. Case No. 1:12-CV-114 TSPublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM DECISION AND ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT

TED STEWART, District Judge.

This matter is before the Court on Defendant Maverik Country Store, Inc.’s (“Maverik”) Motion for Summary Judgment.1 For the reasons set forth below, the Court will grant in part and deny in part Defendant’s Motion.

I. FACTUAL BACKGROUND

The following facts are either uncontro-verted or are viewed in the light most favorable to Plaintiff as the non-moving party. Plaintiff Christine Schofield (“Schofield”) was hired by Maverik in August 2006 to be an adventure…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  4. Faragher v. City of Boca RatonSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
  5. Oncale v. Sundowner Offshore Services, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1998

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Ballage v. Hope & HomeDistrict Court, D. Colorado · 2022
  2. Friends of the Inyo v. U.S. Forest ServiceDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2023
  3. KISSINGER v. THE MENNONITE HOMEDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2021
  4. Toulatos v. Qwest CorporationDistrict Court, D. Utah · 2024

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API