Legal Opinion

Markle v. Indiana State Teachers Ass'n

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided October 27, 1986No. 29A02-8602-CV-50PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BUCHANAN, Chief Judge.

CASE SUMMARY

Plaintiff-appellant Donald Markle (Mar-kle) appeals an order granting defendants-appellants Indiana State Teachers Association and Ralph Emerson [hereinafter collectively referred to as ISTA] relief under Ind.Rules of Procedure, Trial Rule 60(B) based on lack of notice of the ruling on ISTA's motion to correct error, claiming T.R. 72(D), as amended, precludes such relief under these circumstances.

We reverse.

FACTS

The facts most favorable to the trial court's judgment indicate that Markle filed a complaint against ISTA alleging violation of the Federal Wiretap…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Costanzi v. RyanIndiana Court of Appeals · 1977
  2. Draskovich v. PasalichIndiana Court of Appeals · 1972
  3. Westlake v. BenedictIndiana Court of Appeals · 1984
  4. Hendrickson v. American Fletcher National Bank & Trust Co.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1973
  5. McIlwain v. SimmonsIndiana Court of Appeals · 1983

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Markle v. Indiana State Teachers Ass'nIndiana Supreme Court · 1987
  2. Gibson v. Review Board of the Indiana Department of Workforce DevelopmentIndiana Court of Appeals · 1996
  3. Gibson v. Review Board of the Indiana Department of Workforce DevelopmentIndiana Court of Appeals · 1996

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API