Legal Opinion

Lomeli v. Midland Funding, LLC

District Court, N.D. California

Decided September 26, 2019No. 3:19-cv-01141Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 SAN JOSE DIVISION 11 12 JAIME PRIETO LOMELI, Case No. 19-CV-01141-LHK 13 Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING MOTIONS TO COMPEL ARBITRATION AND 14 v. STAYING CASE 15 MIDLAND FUNDING, LLC, et al., Re: Dkt. Nos. 42, 51 16 Defendants. 17 18 This is a putative class action brought by Plaintiff Jamie Lomeli against Midland Funding, 19 LLC (“Midland Funding”), Midland Credit Management, Inc. (“MCM”), Hunt & Henriques 20 (“H&H”), Michael Scott Hunt, and Janalie Ann Henriques (collectively, “Defendants”). Plaintiff 21 alleges that…

2Cases cited32 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Moses H. Cone Memorial Hospital v. Mercury Construction Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
  3. First Options of Chicago, Inc. v. KaplanSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
  4. Mitsubishi Motors Corp. v. Soler Chrysler-Plymouth, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1985
  5. Volt Info. Sciences, Inc. v. Bd. of Trustees of Leland Stanford Jr. U.Supreme Court of the United States · 1989

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API