Johnson Bros. v. Lee
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the CourtHoke, J.
It is now held for law in this jurisdiction that the premises or granting clause of a deed is not to be considered as always controlling' in reference to the estate conveyed, but “if on a perusal of the entire instrument, including the habencfum, it clearly appears that a lesser estate was intended tban that conferred in the premises; such a construction should prevail, and the intent of the grantor be given effect.” In a case before the Court at the present term, Bagwell v. Hines, ante, 691, the position was considered, and the view of the Court as it now prevails concerning it was expressed…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Triplett v. . WilliamsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1908
- Rowland v. . RowlandSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1885
- Hafner v. . IrwinSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1838
- Blackwell v. . BlackwellSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1899
- Powell v. . PowellSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1915
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Bryant v. . ShieldsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1942
- Bryant v. ShieldsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1942
- Griffin v. SpringerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1956
- Moses v. Town of MorgantonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1926
- Edwards v. ButlerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1956
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.