Douglas v. Allied Universal Sec. Servs.
District Court, E.D. New York
1Opinion of the Court
SANKET J. BULSARA, United States Magistrate Judge
The parties have moved for reconsideration of the Court's prior decision declining to grant preliminary approval of their proposed class and collective action settlement. The motion for reconsideration contends that the Court's conclusion-finding that the proposed settlement was structurally incompatible with Cheeks and Section 216(b) of FLSA-rested on "overlooked facts and misapplied legal precedents." (Mem. of Law in Supp. of Joint Mot., attached as Ex. 1 to Joint Mot. for Reconsideration, Dkt. No. 45 ("Joint Mem.") at 1). It did not. The…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Cheeks v. Freeport Pancake House, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2015
- Wolinsky v. Scholastic Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 2012
- Shahriar v. Smith & Wollensky Restaurant Group, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2011
- Douglas v. Allied Universal Sec. Servs.District Court, E.D. New York · 2019
3Cited by11 opinions
- ANDERSON v. TEAM PRIOR INCDistrict Court, D. Maine · 2021
- Keisha Johnson, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated v. Renew, LLC and Neil Karnofsky, D.D.S., PLLCDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2026
- Kirby v. FIC Restaurants, Inc.District Court, N.D. New York · 2020
- Kirby v. FIC Restaurants, Inc.District Court, N.D. New York · 2020
- Lopez v. Silfex, Inc.District Court, S.D. Ohio · 2021
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.