Legal Opinion

United States v. Charley

U.S. Army Court of Military Review

Decided June 29, 1989No. ACMR 8801178PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

CARMICHAEL, Judge:

The two assigned errors in this case pertain to the receipt of evidence during the sentencing proceedings over defense objection. The appellant is a noncommissioned officer with twenty years’ service. He entered provident pleas of guilty to three specifications of making and uttering worthless checks in violation of Article 123a, Uniform Code of Military Justice, 10 U.S.C. § 923a (1982) [hereinafter UCMJ]. Before an officer-enlisted sentencing forum, the trial counsel concentrated on documentary evidence in forcefully and successfully arguing for the…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. United States v. SalesUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1986
  2. United States v. WingartUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1988
  3. United States v. KinmanUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1987
  4. United States v. GlazierUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1988
  5. United States v. BolesUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1981

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. United States v. BroganU.S. Navy-Marine Corps Court of Military Review · 1991
  2. United States v. RosatoU S Air Force Court of Military Review · 1990
  3. United States v. FrazierU S Air Force Court of Military Review · 1991
  4. United States v. MalhiotUnited States Air Force Court of Criminal Appeals · 2004
  5. United States v. PompeyU S Air Force Court of Military Review · 1990

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API