Legal Opinion · Concurrence

Central Trust Co. v. H. B. Mehring Co.

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided February 9, 1928No. [No. 91, October Term, 1927.]Published

1Concurrence

It would seem that the reasons for the writer's only difference with the conclusions expressed in the opinion of Judge Offutt, in which Judge Sloan concurred, should be stated.

The receiver in the instant case was appointed with authority to continue the operation of the business of a failing corporation, which was not engaged in any public service. On the day of the decree the receiver was empowered by an order of the chancellor to borrow the sum of five thousand dollars, and to issue therefor five receiver certificates, bearing interest and payable at a fixed maturity. The order specifically…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Kneeland v. LuceSupreme Court of the United States · 1891
  2. Lockport Felt Co. v. United Box Board & Paper Co.New Jersey Court of Chancery · 1908
  3. Lewis v. Linden Steel Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1897
  4. Homer v. Baltimore Refrigerating & Heating Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1912
  5. York Manufacturing Co. v. Hoblitzell National BankCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1912

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API