Legal Opinion

Nixon v. Reeves

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided June 19, 1896No. Nos. 9392-(11)PublishedCited by 9 opinions

Appeal by defendant from an order of the district court for St. Louis county, Moer, J., denying a motion for a new trial.

1Opinion of the CourtStart, C. J.

Action to recover from the defendant damages for the false imprisonment of the plaintiff. Verdict for the plaintiff for $15. The defendant appeals from an order denying his motion for a new trial.

*160The record presents two questions for our decision: First. Does the complaint state a cause of action? Second. Has a captain of a military company organized pursuant to the Military Code of this state authority to punish summarily by imprisonment an enlisted man, when not in active service, for refusing to obey his orders?

1. The complaint is in these words: “Plaintiff alleges that on the 18th day of…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Lesher v. GetmanSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1883
  2. Warner v. LockerbySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1881

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Phillips v. State, Dept. of DefenseSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1985
  2. Just v. Martin Bros. Co.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1916
  3. State ex rel. Madigan v. WagenerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1898
  4. Meints v. HuntingtonCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1921
  5. Ehrhardt v. WellsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1916

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API