Legal Opinion

Connecticut Insurance v. T. C. Caummisar & Sons

Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976)

Decided February 18, 1927PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion op the Court by

Judge Thomas

Affirming each judgment.

•On December 28, 1921, J. M. Todd & Company were local fire insurance agents in Louisville, and represented the appellants and defendants below, Connecticut Insurance Company, Yorkshire Insurance Company and Great American Insurance Company. On that day, through the solicitation of B. O. Breuer, another fire insurance agent in Louisville, and who was acting as broker for appellee and plaintiff below, T. C. Caummisar & Sons, a corporation, they issued three fire insurance policies for $750.00 each, whereby each defendant insured…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Gilman v. Commonwealth InsuranceSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1914
  2. Rawl v. American Central Ins.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1913
  3. Commercial Union Assur. Co. v. UrbanskyCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1902
  4. Dixie Fire Insurance v. A. Layne & BrotherCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1913

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Stuyvesant Insurance Company v. BarkettCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1928
  2. Standard Fire Insurance Co. v. RobeyCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1934
  3. Farrington v. Commercial Standard Ins. Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1934
  4. Farrington v. Commercial Standard Ins. Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1934

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API