Legal Opinion

Lunderville v. Allen

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Decided September 23, 1966No. 16, Docket 30320PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Per curiam

A motion for judgment by default alleging failure of defendant-appellant timely to answer plaintiff’s complaint was granted in the court below. Defendant-appellant on appeal maintains that, too hastily under the circumstances of this particular case, he has been deprived of his day in court and has been inequitably prevented from defending upon the merits.

It indeed appears that the court below has a heavy docket and that it must of necessity and as a general rule, in that busy court, dispose of cases with dispatch where issue is not timely joined. Nevertheless, in order to prevent a possible…

2Cited by5 opinions

  1. Tolson v. HodgeCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1969
  2. United States v. ManosDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 1972
  3. Ida Mae Lunderville v. James K. AllenCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1966
  4. Troy L. Tolson v. Melba Joyce Hodge, Administratrix of the Estate of Arthur Eugene Hodge, Troy L. Tolson v. Melba Joyce Hodge, Administratrix of the Estate of Arthur Eugene HodgeCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1969
  5. Welch v. Self (In re Self)United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Florida. · 1993

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API