Moore v. State
Court of Appeals of Georgia
1Opinion of the CourtBroyles, C. J.
“It is well settled that while it is not incumbent upon the judge, in the absence of a,timely and appropriate written request, to charge upon the subject of the impeachment of witnesses, yet where that subject is referred to in the charge, all of it that is material and applicable to the facts of the case should be given.” Williams v. State, 35 Ga. App. 193 (103 S. E. 875), and cit. Applying the foregoing ruling to the facts of the instant case, the court erred in the following particulars: (1) in failing to instruct the jury that in determining the credibility of the witnesses they could…
2Cited by5 opinions
- Tucker v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1956
- Callaway v. CoxCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1946
- Brooks v. WoffordCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1953
- Haynes v. PhillipsCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1943
- Arnold v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1956