Cumberland Telephone & Telegraph Co. v. Taylor
Indiana Court of Appeals
From Floyd Circuit Court; William C. Utz, Judge. Action by Charles Taylor against the Cumberland Telephone and Telegraph Company. From a judgment for plaintiff, defendant appeals.
1Opinion of the CourtComstock, J.
Appellee sued the appellant to recover damages for the alleged conversion of a horse and for injuries alleged to have been received by said horse while in possession of said company under a contract of hiring. The amended complaint was in three paragraphs, the substance of each being as follows: The first paragraph alleges that on August 8, 1906, Taylor was the owner, and entitled to immediate possession, of a horse worth $175; that on said day the defendant, being in the possession of the horse, converted and disposed of the same to its own use, to Taylor’s damage in the sum of $175.
The…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Direct Navigation Co. v. DavidsonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1903
- Mason v. BriggsMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1820
- Esmay v. FanningNew York Supreme Court · 1850
- Monnot v. IbertNew York Supreme Court · 1859
- Higgins v. EmmonsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1823
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Glass v. Allied Van Lines, Inc.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1970
- Beaver Products Co. v. VoorheesIndiana Court of Appeals · 1924
- Handlan Buck Manufacturing Co. v. Stave Electrical Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1913