Legal Opinion

Chambers v. Stihl Incorporated USA

District Court, E.D. Arkansas

Decided August 11, 2023No. 4:22-cv-00688Unknown

1Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS CENTRAL DIVISION STEVEN CHAMBERS PLAINTIFF v. 4:22-CV-00688-BRW STIHL INCORPORATED USA DEFENDANT ORDER Pending is Plaintiff’s Motion to Remand (Doc. No. 36). Defendant has responded.1 For the reasons set out below, the motion to remand is DENIED. I. BACKGROUND This case arises out of the warranties Defendant allegedly provides with products that it manufactures and sells.2 Plaintiff alleges the warranties prohibit the use of third-party repair services or parts in violation of the Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act (“MMWA”).3 Plaintiff…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Westerfeld v. Independent Processing, LLCCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2010
  2. Abraham Lizama v. Victoria's Secret Stores, LLCCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2022

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API