Legal Opinion
Castle Rose, Inc. v. Philadelphia Bar & Grill of Arizona, Inc.
Nebraska Supreme Court
Decided March 27, 1998No. S-96-967PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtCaporale, J.
The district court sustained the special appearance filed by the defendant-appellee Philadelphia Bar and Grill of Arizona, Inc., and subsequently dismissed the cause of the plaintiff-appellant, Castle Rose, Inc. The defendants-appellees Paul D. Kogel, David T. Robinson, and Thomas D. LeClair were all shareholders of the Arizona corporation. Asserting that the district court erred in finding it lacked personal jurisdiction over the Arizona corporation, Castle Rose appealed to the Nebraska Court of Appeals. Under our authority to regulate the caseloads of that court and this court, we removed…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Burger King Corp. v. RudzewiczSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- World-Wide Volkswagen Corp. v. WoodsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Hanson v. DencklaSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
- Williams v. Gould, Inc.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1989
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Holste v. Burlington Northern RailroadNebraska Supreme Court · 1999
- Quality Pork International v. Rupari Food Services, Inc.Nebraska Supreme Court · 2004
- Crete Carrier Corp. v. Red Food Stores, Inc.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1998
- Meyer v. Race City Classics, LLCCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2014
- Robinson v. NABCO, INC.Nebraska Court of Appeals · 2002
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.