Legal Opinion

Bristor v. Kretz

New York Supreme Court

Decided December 15, 1897PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHirschberg, J.

This action is brought under the provisions -of section 51 of the Stock Corporation Law (Chap. 688, Laws of 1892), making stockholders of every stock corporation “ personally liable for all debts due and owing to any of its -laborers, servants or employees other than contractors, for services performed • by them for such corporation.”

■The plaintiff is an attorney-at-law, and the services performed by him were professional- services rendered pursuant to a written ■agreement by which the corporation employed him, in the language of the complaint, “ to do .and perform such work as it might place…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Gurney v. Atlantic & Great Western Railway Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1874

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Latta v. LonsdaleCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1901
  2. Bristor v. SmithAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1898
  3. Klepner v. DorfmanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API