Bristor v. Kretz
New York Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtHirschberg, J.
This action is brought under the provisions -of section 51 of the Stock Corporation Law (Chap. 688, Laws of 1892), making stockholders of every stock corporation “ personally liable for all debts due and owing to any of its -laborers, servants or employees other than contractors, for services performed • by them for such corporation.”
■The plaintiff is an attorney-at-law, and the services performed by him were professional- services rendered pursuant to a written ■agreement by which the corporation employed him, in the language of the complaint, “ to do .and perform such work as it might place…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Gurney v. Atlantic & Great Western Railway Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1874
3Cited by3 opinions
- Latta v. LonsdaleCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1901
- Bristor v. SmithAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1898
- Klepner v. DorfmanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998