Gore v. Davis
Supreme Court of Georgia
1Opinion of the Court
Undercofler, Presiding Justice.
Gore attacks the constitutionality of the Abandoned Motor Vehicles Act, Code Ann. § 68-2301 et seq. (Ga. L. 1972, p. 342; 1975, p. 913; 1977, p. 253) contending the due process requirements of the Georgia and United States Constitutions are offended because nowhere in the statute is there provision for judicial supervision, proper notice or for a hearing prior to or after the deprivation of property under a sale authorized by the Act. He claims the trial court erred in granting summary judgment to the appellee in an action for wrongful conversion. We need look…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Flagg Bros., Inc. v. BrooksSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Sharrock v. Dell Buick-Cadillac, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1978
- Sikes v. PierceSupreme Court of Georgia · 1956
- King v. PateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1960
- Southern Railway Co. v. Town of TempleSupreme Court of Georgia · 1953
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Allstate Insurance v. AmmonsCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1981
- Mapp v. First Georgia BankCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1980
- Arilotta v. First Georgia InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1986
- Gore v. DavisSupreme Court of Georgia · 1979