Legal Opinion

Londry's Appeal

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Decided April 17, 1906PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Appeal from the action of the County Commissioners of Hartford County revoking the appellant’s liquor license, taken to the Superior Court in Hartford County where the cause was erased (Reed, J.) from the docket, upon motion of the County Commissioners, and from this order of erasure the appellant appealed.

1Opinion of the CourtHamersley, J.

Chapter 60 of the Public Acts bf 1881 (p. 30) provided that (§ 1) every person who should sell intoxicating liquor to a minor, etc., should be fined or imprisoned, or both; and (§ 2) that if any licensed person should violate any provision of the laws in relation to intoxicating liquor, such violation should, in addition to the penalty prescribed for the offense, work a forfeiture of his license and of all moneys that might have been paid therefor. The third section of the Act repealed a section in the Revision of 1875 which described in somewhat different language the offense described, in §…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Moynihan's Appeal From County CommissionersSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1903
  2. Burns' AppealSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1904
  3. Hewitt's AppealSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1904
  4. Wakeman's Appeal From County CommissionersSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1901

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Coles' AppealSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1907

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API